Does a person forfeit their constitutional rights when they join a veterans organization?
A comprehensive procedure sequence, along with all necessary documents and information, is essential for conducting disciplinary hearings as outlined in Article IX – Discipline, Sections 903-904 – Procedure for Disciplinary Actions of the VFW Congressional Charter Bylaws Manual of Procedure and Ritual for any year.
If you believe that former and current National Adjutant General Kevin Jones and Dan West, along with former National Commanders Fritz Mihelcic—who is a long-time member of the bar and an established attorney—and Al Lipphardt, as well as the National Council of Administration, intentionally engaged in conduct likely to cause harm to the defendant without any legitimate reason, please consider this information. All individuals mentioned and various VFW posts nationwide failed to answer basic questions and could not claim the prize.
It is important to note that due process requires a conviction to be supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt for each essential element of the alleged offense(s), as determined by a rational trier of fact. A mere modicum of incriminating evidence cannot, by itself, rationally support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, I urge you to stop donating to the VFW.
Presumption of Innocence; Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. It is a cardinal principle of our system of justice that every person accused of a crime is presumed to be innocent unless and until his or her guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption is not a mere formality.
Former National Commanders Fritz Mihelcic, a long-time member of the bar and an established attorney at law, and Al Lipphardt, and former and current National Adjutant Generals Kevin Jones and Dan West, have determined that all actions taken in the defendants’ disciplinary hearing and appeals were by the law as well as Article IX – Discipline, Sections 903-904, outlines the procedure for disciplinary actions in the 2019 VFW Congressional Charter Bylaws Manual of Procedure Ritual.
According to Section 15002(b)(1) of the CARES Act, H.R. 748, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 5(f), 10(c), and 43(b)(2) allow courts to conduct certain criminal proceedings via video teleconferencing, provided that there is written consent from the defendant or the defendant’s attorney. The people mentioned above violated this fundamental federal law regarding due process in videoFormer National Commanders Fritz Mihelcic, a long-time member of the bar and an established attorney, and Al Lipphardt, along with former and current National Adjutant Generals Kevin Jones and Dan West, determined that all actions taken during the defendants’ disciplinary hearing and appeals were in accordance with the law.
According to Section 15002(b)(1) of the CARES Act, H.R. 748, as well as Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 5(f), 10(c), and 43(b)(2), courts are permitted to conduct certain criminal proceedings via video teleconferencing, provided there is written consent from the defendant or the defendant’s attorney. The individuals mentioned above violated this fundamental federal law concerning due process in video teleconferencing.
This law also applies to VFW disciplinary hearings. A letter from Mihelcic and Jones dated 2 Sep 2021, clearly states in paragraph 3 that the defendant “refuses any Zoom-type gathering,… will only participate in a formal hearing,… and will not accept any Zoom-style meetings.”
The original disciplinary hearing was postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic. It is essential that the nationwide Federal Judiciary and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) be adhered to by law. The defendant complied with Section 15002 and refused to participate in any video trials, as noted in the letter from Mihelcic and Jones. teleconferencing.
This law applies to VFW disciplinary hearings as well. The letter from Mihelcic and Jones dated September 2, 2021, clearly states in paragraph 3 that the defendant “refuses any Zoom-type gathering,… will only participate in a formal hearing,… and will not accept any Zoom-style meetings.”
The original discipline hearing was postponed, citing that the coronavirus law must be followed throughout the disciplinary action. The nationwide Federal Judiciary and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) must be followed by law. The defendant complied with Section 15002 and refused to participate in any video trials, as stated in the 2 Sep 2021 letter from Mihelcic and Jones.